Sunday, January 5, 2014

Blue Jasmine - Analytical Essay


Kevin Smock
29 August 2013

     Any experienced screenwriter knows that the development of their script lies in their ability to write in a cause and effect fashion. By looking at writing in such a way, the audience is forced to participate actively in what’s occurring on screen. For instance, say there is a white collar, hardworking man who is on his way to a promotion once he finishes up a case study for his firm. Let us also say he has a wife who is well aware the case study is not the only thing he is doing at the office after hours. Given this knowledge, let’s go: The angry wife sneaks into her husband’s office late at night and deletes the case study off his computer (CAUSE). Now, being that we know the importance of this case study, we’re going to anticipate the husband’s reaction (EFFECT), we might even have some expectations regarding how the husband will respond. This is a convention. A man like Mr. Woody Allen, after being in the game for forty years or so, is bound to play around with it, and he certainly does in his latest film, Blue Jasmine.
     Instead of starting off the film with a cause, Mr. Allen kicks it off with an effect: Jasmine, our protagonist, is venting to an elderly woman about her ex-husband on an airplane. Shortly after, we learn Jasmine doesn’t even know the elderly woman she’s rambling to, which is really saying something about her instability early on. Given this effect, we learn about the CAUSE throughout the whole setup portion of the film via flashback. This is also a nice way of dealing with exposition/ back-story. Also, the way in which the flashbacks occur are very unique. For instance, the first time we see Jasmine walk into her sister’s home, Jasmine’s temporary home, we flashback to one of the many homes she used to live in. Her old home was much more luxurious than what she’s living in now, establishing a nice parallel. Theses instances occur many times throughout, giving us a nice sense of repetition.
     About midway through, the narrative stops depending so heavily on the flashbacks and the other conflicts start to really take off. Such as: Jasmine and Dwight’s relationship and Ginger’s loves life with Eddie that’s crossed by Al. In the end, Ginger ends up happy with Eddie while Jasmine ends up stuck in her xanax dependent ways. Although the ending is sad, it’s fair. Jasmine never learns her lesson. She blows off the struggle of work and school at her first opportunity to gold dig again. Jasmine has a shot at self-made happiness, she just isn’t willing to work for it.
     Since I’ve been doing nothing but praising the film, one would find it hard to believe that when the film first started I was prepared to resent it. I’m all for opening a film on a visual note for many reasons: It lets viewers perceive and take in what they need to in order to enter the world of the film. Also, opening on action is a great way to light a dramatic fuse, and then later scenes can offer any exposition. Furthermore, they’re great for raising expectations, something that concrete, spoken words cannot do as well. Although Mr. Allen opens with dialogue, he pays much respect to the art of editing. He compresses the time it takes from being in an airplane until the moment you leave the airport with your bags to just a few a few shots. Each shot is spatially different than the shot before and after, yet very specific to the whole airport process. In each shot Jasmine is rambling to a perfect stranger about her life. The snappy, rhythmic cuts convey to us that Jasmine has not shut up. Very fun; very comical.

No comments:

Post a Comment